Trump’s major tactical error…

This US presidential race just gets crazier. A clearly declining, periodically confused president, a disastrous debate that sealed Biden’s fate, an attempted assassination of Trump, Biden stepping down, Kamala Harris stepping up, the new Democrat presidential candidate raising record donations in the history of a presidential race in the first 24 hours. Phew!

It is too early to say who will win the Harris versus Trump race but that is a huge improvement on last week when Trump looked the firm favourite versus Biden. The next few weeks will test whether Harris has a glass jaw, whether failed illegal immigration policies dog her, whether she is seen as too close to Biden and too left-wing, whether the American people are ready for a black woman to be their president. Harris has her frailties, but she has started confidently and charismatically, and the startling contrast of prosecutor versus felon must mean something. Her stance on abortion rights will also be a huge bonus, contrasting with the Catholic Biden’s relatively quiet stance on the subject.

Very early days but Kamala Harris has started well…

Some hand-wringing liberal commentators in the media criticise the fact there is not an open contest to prove Harris’s credentials. Nonsense. There isn’t the time. The Democrats need to find their backbone and ruthlessly drive Harris to victory now, not next week, not the week after, not at the convention etc. Do US voters really care about internal democracy in the Democratic Party? No. If Harris blows up, so be it. No other candidate could establish themselves in the time available and raise the necessary funds to win.

Trump is now the only old man in the race, and it already shows. He needed Biden and he hasn’t got him anymore. Bring it on.

But Trump could have been so much smarter since the attempted assassination and with Biden’s resignation. In his convention speech, he started well, in advance pledging to unite the nation. That’s when I thought it was really game over. But no, he couldn’t help himself. In a rambling address to his adoring audience, he went on the attack. Referencing war, weakness, chaos, referencing the killing fields of Washington, the invasion by criminal aliens, witch hunts, crazy Democrats, it was as divisive as it could get. Then there was the ‘drill, baby, drill’ comments and the boasts… wow there were so many, including ending all wars. The narcissism was breath-taking.

Compounding this tactical error when he could have risen above the fray was Trump’s response to Biden standing down. Just read this:

“Crooked Joe Biden was not fit to run for President, and is certainly not fit to serve – And never was!… the Worst President, by far, in the History of our Nation.”

Not an ounce of grace. Preening, divisive, ungracious, quite frankly rude. Some might say barking. And it is that, former President Trump, that will hopefully do for you in the end.

Right-wing analysis of Tory defeat deeply flawed

I attended a Spectator magazine event last week evaluating the fall-out of the general election result. There was an attempt to gain comfort from Labour’s low share of the vote and also a good deal of guff about the future of the Tory Party, not least from one Jacob Rees-Mogg.

Complacent analysis from the hard Right of Tory Party on the path back to power…

His analysis was that all would be right if the Tories moved to the Right, embracing much of Reform’s agenda. Unable to contain myself any longer, in subsequent questions, I pointed out a few basic facts for explaining the election result. It wasn’t about Labour’s low share of the vote but about a desire from voters that it had to be anybody but the Tories. Only a third of Reform’s vote apparently came from 2019 Tory supporters, the rest drawn from elsewhere and those who hadn’t voted before. Add to that, the incompetence and a sense of entitlement from a merry-go-round of Tory leaders, and the defeat had very little to do with not being right-wing enough. I finished by noting how he should be ashamed of himself for his complacency to quite a few cheers (as well as some boos!) from a largely Tory audience. Perhaps there is hope yet.

Rees-Mogg’s response that the Tories had performed strongly by being firmly on the Right in 1970, 1979, 1983, 1987 and 2019 does not bear up to scrutiny as a subsequent questioner pointed out. You have to take into consideration the strength of your Opposition in those years which was deeply split in 1983, a busted flush in 1970, 1979 and extreme left in 2019. Economically, ex-Brexit, the Tory Party’s manifesto was hardly right-wing in 2019 either. To be fair Rees-Mogg did go on to say that Labour is likely to be in power for at least 10 years; that expectations of Starmer are so modest, he could easily surprise on the upside and that he could see Labour winning next time round with a smaller majority but a higher share of the vote. Hey ho.

Then onto to a Conservative European Forum meeting where the estimable Alex Chalk, defeated MP for Cheltenham and former Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, spoke. He talked eloquently about the need of the Conservative Party to demonstrate integrity and putting country before party again. He discussed the worldwide reputation of our legal system, the soft power it provides and the folly of leaving the ECHR, pointing out that it would solve almost none of our immigration challenges. He spoke about improving the quality of future parliamentary candidates and only allowing MPs to choose the Tory leader understanding they had far more insight into the strengths and weaknesses of candidates than a shrinking pool of members who are increasingly unrepresentative of ordinary Tory voters.

So which route back to power for the Tories makes sense? An unthinking lurch to the Right or sorting out more fundamental problems in how today’s Tory Party is run and how it comprehensively restores its reputation for good governance.

The latter, harder route is clearly the one to take but do the majority of today’s Tories really have the appetite for it?

Tories on course to make the wrong leadership choice

They never learn. They never learn. The Party membership is to the right of ordinary Conservative voters and their final, decisive role in choosing the next leader (they vote between the last two leading candidates after MPs have chosen the shortlist) is likely to take the Tories into a cul-de-sac of their own making.

Who are the runners and riders in what (quite rightly) will probably be a lengthy leadership campaign but with no certainty of redemption at the end of it?

A poll of members today confirmed the current favourite is Kemi Badenoch. Why? She has no legislative achievements to her name, is unnecessarily aggressive, particularly with the media, and seems to have made her name by pursuing culture wars. Whilst her views may be sincerely held, that is hardly where the Tories are going to regain voters.

Nobody above is likely to be the next Prime Minister…

Then there is Suella Braverman. To the right even of the most die-hard Tory members although still attracting the votes of 16% of them, she has disgraced herself with an article just before the election damning the Tory election campaign and then this week with her homophobic rant. She is truly awful. Extreme, disloyal and with no sense of public service. The sooner she joins Reform, the better.

Right-wing Priti Patel, another former Home Secretary, is mooted to be standing but is not up to the job. Caught dancing with Farage last year, although now claiming he has no future in the Tory Party, she should perhaps dance off to Reform too.

Finally, on the Right, the smarmy, reinvented immigration hard-liner, Robert Jenrick, who left Sunak’s government in a sulk at not getting a full cabinet post, is simply not credible.

The moderate candidates so far are James Cleverly, Tom Tugendhat and Victoria Atkins. All three are decent people but Cleverly will simply be a short-term, stop-gap leader and it doesn’t feel Atkins is quite ready for it. Tom Tugendhat is the best bet but is unlikely to clear the hurdle set by the Tory membership. Sadly, the estimable Jeremy Hunt has understandably ruled himself out of the contest.

A few points to note. The Tories lost most of their key southern seats to the LibDems. How the hell are they going to regain them by moving to the right? What’s left of the Tory parliamentary party is fairly centrist. Perhaps the membership will surprise us with a more moderate choice if enough have cleared off to Reform by the time of the vote. If the Tories embrace Farage/Reform in any way, it will be the permanent end of the Tory Party. If I were the LibDems, I would already be making plans now to entice moderate Tory MPs to join them if this unlikely occurrence happens. More on that in a future blog.

What is almost certain is the next Tory leader will not be the next Prime Minister. In fact the next leader, whilst fulfilling the important role of trying to hold the government to account, will largely be an irrelevance. Just ask William Hague.

Time for the Tories to tackle Farage head on

Well, I have to say last week’s pre-election blog was pretty much accurate. As expected, the Tories got over 100 seats (I have won £10 and a lobster dinner!) as Reform fell back a little. Labour romped home, albeit with a disappointing share of the vote and the LibDems had a great night too. Throughout the campaign they looked like the only politicians enjoying themselves. Good for them. The almost total wipe-out of the SNP was perhaps the biggest surprise of the night. That’s Scottish independence on the backburner for a generation.

For now, everybody should hope Starmer succeeds…

But the Tories’ 121 seat defeat was the worst result in their history. After 14 years of missteps (that’s putting it politely…) where does this well-deserved defenestration leave them?

Do you remember the raison d’etre of calling the Brexit referendum in the first place, which sowed the seeds of their ultimate demise? It was to cure the Tory Party of its internal splits on Europe. Err… that went well, didn’t it…?

Here we are 8 years on, and the hugely diminished Tory Party is now plagued by a resurgent anti-Europe, anti-immigration Reform UK party, with 4m votes and 5 seats in parliament. All that cosying up to the Right by Sunak and his predecessors came to naught. The ridiculous Rwanda plan was a perfect example. Peddled in the dying days of the last government by a Prime Minister who didn’t really believe in it, it was a waste of time, making the Tories look unpleasant, and incompetent at the same time.

There is only one solution for the long term recovery of the Tory Party. Tackle Farage and Reform UK with their dog whistle rhetoric head on. To paraphrase Matthew Parris, the more you compromise with the populist Right, the more ground they want. Now is the time to give them nothing.

With Labour securing 412 seats on only 34% of the vote and a largely sympathetic LibDem Party, the country will need thoughtful, moderate, centre-right Opposition. One that outlines the benefits of effectively controlled immigration, that advocates closer ties with Europe both economically and to sort out the boats crisis, that praises the advantages of a multicultural Britain, that understands the economic pressures on poorer voters and comes up with solutions that don’t simply involve talking about taxes and lashing out at minorities/the EU. The Tories also specifically need to pivot to offering policies for a younger generation of voters. They should support Starmer, where he is getting things right (not follow the ridiculous advice from the anti-patriot Johnson who advocates attacking him from the start). They should regain a reputation for steady, quiet competence.

The Tories lost voters to a range of parties, not just Reform. Notably the LibDems in the south. It was their clowning incompetence that did for them, not being insufficiently right-wing.

There is a gaping hole in the centre-right of politics from where elections are won and the Tories must move there, understanding recovery may take ten years. With careful analysis, a new leader, who almost certainly will not become the next Prime Minister, should take time to root out Farage/Reform at their source and let them wither on the fringes of politics. It is where they belong.

Too close to call…

By that, I mean whether the Tories gain over 100 seats or not… reinforced by yesterday’s YouGov poll.

In what will be a well-deserved calamitous result for the Tories, they will face a wipe-out across the country, not so much due to a huge swell of support for Labour but a combination of the collapse of the SNP, resurgent LibDems in the South, Reform attacking from the Right and tactical voting to oust as many Tories as possible. It is time for a change.

Tories fighting to clear 100 seats…

I confess that I have had two bets on the election outcome for some time. Neither will make me rich, and neither are due to insider knowledge… One is with a colleague for £10 and one with a journalist for a lobster supper, and both are based on my view that the Tories will gain over 100 seats. Why?

There is a genuine fear amongst some of the electorate that Labour’s majority will be too great. Probably even Starmer doesn’t want a 200 seat majority. Imagine the indiscipline and lack of mandate based on 40% or so of the vote. Enough former Tory voters may well pull back from the brink of voting Reform, who will still have a reasonable night regardless.

What will not help the Tories’ cause is the last minute, almost insulting appearance of Boris Johnson on the campaign trail. No doubt emboldened by the resurgence of Donald Trump, this ludicrous, narcissistic character believes he can perhaps be the Tories’ post-election saviour when, in reality, he is the principal architect of the party’s demise. His appearance will simply remind floating voters of this.

What a battle lies ahead for the soul of what is left of a once impregnable Tory Party, already written off by a deeply unhelpful article in yesterday’s Telegraph by the charming former Home Secretary, Suella Braverman. But that is for another day. Sunak, who has fought a somewhat ill-judged but brave campaign, deserves better.

As France toys with fascism – there is no other word for it – and Trump prospers at the expense of a clearly too frail Biden, the UK, for all the problems the country faces, could be a beacon of stability in a sea of polarisation after today. And if for no other reason, that is a note of optimism on which to end this overly long, tedious election campaign.

Happy voting!