It looks really bad from a US perspective…

I’m currently on a business trip to the United States expecting to write about US politics. But, relatively speaking, little is happening here compared to the chaos unfolding in the UK. Biden’s stock is slowly rising, albeit from a very low base, and Trump is increasingly discredited. All but his most loyal fanatics are tiring of the Trump drama. Politics is no less polarised and the lead players may well change but, except for hurricanes of the weather sort, the news agenda is fairly quiet.

Meanwhile, from here, the UK looks like a horror show and in meetings with US asset managers, there is real puzzlement with the actions of the Truss government. It seems in freefall as the consequences of reckless tax cuts come home to roost through violent market reactions.

They discuss whether politics over the pond are those of an Emerging Market which is where the UK is going to end up if we carry on like this. In an investment category with the likes of South America, Eastern Europe et al…

Mainstream views from investment professionals are that our economic woes are entirely self-inflicted, starting with Brexit and now multiplying through the actions of an increasingly ideological, some might say out of control Tory administration. Regardless of this blog’s well documented views on unTory behaviour, I am simply relating what I am hearing.

Here in the US, they don’t know Starmer but they do know Johnson and now Truss. Oh dear…they are not impressed.

And when you hear Truss might be replaced by Johnson or the recently defeated, but seemingly very wise Rishi Sunak, the sense of chaos grows. We should be ashamed at the current state of UK politics which is getting too much attention even by this famously inward-looking ally.

The best comment I have recently read on Twitter came from a parent who said whilst it was impressive Queen Elizabeth had overseen 15 PMs, his six year old daughter had seen four. Incredibly, that may rise to five before his daughter makes seven…

Meanwhile, my US trip is now increasingly and achingly expensive…

Liz Truss going for broke

You have to give it to the new PM. She has flown out of the traps with a massive intervention in energy markets and huge tax cuts.

Moving fast…

The ideological divide has never been clearer. Tories cut taxes to drive growth, aiming to shrink the State. Labour raise taxes selectively to sort the cost of living crisis with no desire to shrink anything. The ‘shopping trolley’ days of the Johnson regime are over.

The challenge for Truss is twofold. First, the Tories have been in power for 12 years and there must be a limit to how often they can reinvent themselves. Second, it is a massive £105 billion gamble with the public finances.

And the verdict from objective markets? Interest rate and inflation expectations have been revised upwards, stocks have fallen, and Sterling is at a 40 year low, heading to parity against the US dollar.

Johnson was unTory in all sorts of ways as this blog has written about many times, but this mini (more like max!) budget is, if anything, more unTory. Debt will soar and the cost of servicing it in the face of rising interest rates will soar faster. Sound finances were always at the heart of Tory administrations but not now with these unfunded tax cuts. Rishi Sunak must be turning in his political grave…

The hope is that the stimulus will rejuvenate the economy in time for the next election and any negative consequences from these new policies can be parked until after then. Truss will have to be incredibly fortunate for this to happen at the very least in terms of timing.

Labour’s response to Kwasi Kwarteng’s statement by the Shadow Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, impressed and she looks and sounds like a future leader. Of course, the ideological divide may work in the Tories’ favour but if Labour can’t win next time round, surely we are heading towards a One Party State. Now that’s a thought…

Liz Truss’s key weapon: low expectations

I have a confession…. One of my roles as a Tory parliamentary assessor back in the days of Cameron was to help ensure more women candidates were selected. I came across an email exchange in 2008 with one Liz Truss, providing coaching advice to help her selection chances. She was picked to fight a safe Tory seat in Norfolk shortly afterwards. The rest is history as they say. Only time will tell whether I should have kept this to myself…

So, as expected, Liz Truss is the new PM but by a smaller majority than many forecast. And what a mountain she now has to climb as she faces energy, inflation and NHS crises.

Expectations are so low there is little downside…

It will be tough. She starts with only 57% support from Tory members (47% if you include those who didn’t vote), 32% of MPs (15% at the start of the contest) and a 12% approval rating from general voters according to some polls.

Truss’s self-belief is apparently legendary according to colleagues. It will need to be.

And that self-belief has already showed itself with a bold start. A partisan Cabinet of allies and a move to the Right with tax cuts combined with huge amounts of new borrowing and continuing culture wars. One Cabinet minister particularly makes you shudder. Suella Braverman as Home Secretary. Really? Likely to be highly aggressive on immigration, the EU and careless with judicial independence. She will have liberals and the Left foaming at the mouth. Perhaps that is the point.

So the Opposition has all to play for. With the scale of crises engulfing the country, Truss hasn’t got long to prove herself and many of all persuasions think she will fail. One misstep and it is game over.

But therein lies the trap. Big policy announcements, some borrowed ideas from opponents, might just surprise massively low voter expectations on the upside. Constant, urgent activity from a government simply doing things might impress.

On balance, Truss will probably fail because her Government lacks the necessary communication skills from the top, is too right-wing and partisan, managing to upset voters in the North and South for different reasons in the process.

But if I were Starmer or even Ed Davey of the LibDems I would articulate a clear alternative quickly and keep my guard up.

Tories in no mood for technocrats…

As we come to the end of an excruciating Tory leadership campaign, two thoughts come to mind; this is no way to choose a Prime Minister and populism is still alive and kicking in the Tory Party despite the painful experience of Johnson.

Truss’s simple populist messages outweigh Sunak’s technocratic competency

Rishi Sunak has fought a brave, some would say foolhardy campaign, burning bridges as he lashes out at Truss’s incoherent and possibly dangerous economic policies. He has told the Tory membership what they don’t want to hear; no major tax cuts until we can afford them, problems with Johnson’s leadership and home truths about what government can actually accomplish in the face of horrendous challenges. He is bright, has all the numbers at his fingertips, and has largely avoided (except for the odd clumsy intervention) an obsession with an anti-woke agenda. He has also decided not to treat the EU or indeed Macron in particular as a possible enemy. This is a recipe for defeat! Sunak is simply too conventional, too practical and too technocratic for Tory members’ appetite. They want more red meat. It has also led him to be inconsistent at times (VAT cut on fuel for example) as he desperately chases implacable Tory members’ votes, and this has been the fundamental weakness of his campaign.

Liz Truss on the other hand has kept her messages relatively consistent, upbeat and simple. Tax cuts, a smaller state, slashing rules and being tough on overseas aggressors, the latter encompassing the EU and Macron, not just Putin and Xi. Oh dear. Just what Tory members want to hear in addition to throwing compliments at Johnson’s premiership. I wonder whether that particular love-in will continue when Johnson plots a potential comeback…

The FT carried an article by Janan Ganesh recently praising dull leaders saying Starmer and Biden, like Harry Truman and Clement Attlee, were underestimated in their appeal to swing voters. I am not so sure. Being a competent bore in the serious occupation of politics is a good thing but in a social media obsessed world which shrinks attention spans to a nanosecond, does such an argument carry weight? Certainly not amongst Party members, as Ganesh rightly highlights, where Republican obsessions with Trump, for example, and now Tories’ rethink about Johnson proves populism is alive and well amongst believers despite all its ultimate failings.

Liz Truss is no Johnson or indeed Thatcher, but her simple populist messages will carry her to victory among members next week (one suspects not by quite the margin most commentators expect) if not convincing her parliamentary colleagues. It will be a turbulent and possibly short-lived premiership. Starmer better hope Ganesh is right in his analysis of the merits of dullness if he is to bring an overstretched Tory reign to an end.